Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

SCREAM-relevant events

3:30pm-4:15pm: 45 min breakout session

Afternoon poster session

8:30-10:30am: 20 min SCREAM overview during that time

3:15-4:15pm: 1 hr breakout session

8:30-10:30am: will include 2x 15 min SCREAM plenary talks

11-12:40: speed dating… SCREAM meets with Shaocheng’s NGD and infrastructure

Breakout #1: SCREAMv0 (Nov 19 3:30-4:15)

  1. Short intro by Peter Caldwell about what SCREAM is and how we’ve organized sessions (3 min)

  2. Status of SCREAMv0 (combination of Ben Hillman , Chris Terai , Noel Keen , and maybe Paul Ullrich ) (20 min)

    1. current capabilities and remaining issues

    2. throughput (in SDPD), cost (in MPPs/SD), and outlook for improvement

    3. assessment of model climate

  3. Boutique configurations (combination of Peter Bogenschutz , Hassan Beydoun , Wuyin Lin , and Qi Tang ?) (15 min)

    1. IOP-SCREAM

    2. RCE-SCREAM

    3. forecasts

    4. RRM?

  4. Simulation plans (Peter Caldwell , 1 slide) (2 min)

Breakout #2: SCREAMv1 (Nov 20th, 3:15-4:15pm)

  1. NH Dynamics efforts (Oksana Guba , Andrew Steyer (Unlicensed) , Luca Bertagna , Mark Taylor ) 15 min?

  2. Getting the right answer: testing, design docs, etc (James Foucar , Andrew Bradley , Kyle Pressel (Unlicensed) , etc) (20 min, or more if needed)

  3. What does our C++/Kokkos code looks like? (James Foucar et al, <5 min?)

  4. Atmosphere Driver (Aaron Donahue and Luca Bertagna ) 20 min?

Plenaries (Nov 21, 8:30-10:30am)

We have 2x 15 min slots. It seems like the SCREAMv0 and “Getting the Right Answer” talks from above would be ideal as plenaries, but I also like how they frame their respective breakout sessions and am unclear what we would put in those breakouts instead.

What Actually Happened

Action items

  • No labels