The Design Document page provides a description of the algorithms, implementation and planned testing including unit, verification, validation and performance testing. Please read Step 1.3 Performance Expectations that explains feature documentation requirements from the performance group point of view.
Design Document
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
The first table in Design Document gives overview of this document, from this info the Design Documents Overview page is automatically created. In the overview table below 4.Equ means Equations and Algorithms, 5.Ver means Verification, 6.Perf - Performance, 7. Val - Validation
Use the symbols below (copy and paste) to indicate if the section is in progress or done or not started. |
...
Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
...
Expand | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
|
Title: SNICAR-AD Shortwave Radiation for Sea Ice and Land
Requirements and Design
E3SM Cryosphere Group
Date:
Summary
Modify ELM: modify the land shortwave code to include a subroutine that adopts the new radiative transfer algorithm.
MPAS-seaice: modify the sea-ice shortwave radiative transfer code to include a new subroutine SNICAR_AD that
- provides new input files for snow and ice optics adopted by ELM;
- expands the shortwave radiative calculation from three to 5 five subdivided solar bands adopted by ELM;
- removes empirical adjustment for radiative-effective snow grain size;
- adopts a new algorithm to correct for the bias of near-infrared albedo and absorption when solar zenith angles are larger than 75 degrees.
Date last modified: Jun 1st, 2019
Contributors: Cheng Dang (Unlicensed) Charlie Zender
Algorithmic Formulations
Design solution: described in the following article
Dang, C., Zender, C. S., and Flanner, M. G.: Inter-comparison and improvement of 2-stream shortwave radiative transfer models for a unified treatment of cryospheric surfaces in ESMs, The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-22, in review, 2019.
Date last modified: July 1st, 2019
Contributors: Cheng Dang (Unlicensed) Charlie Zender Mark Flanner
Design and Implementation
Implementation:
In the sea-ice and land shortwave code (ice_shortwace.F90, we added a new subroutine SnowSnicarMod.F90), we implemented SNICAR_AD to compute the shortwave radiative properties of snow-covered sea ice, which that can be turned on by setting config_use_snicar_ad to true.
Pseudo code:
if snow-covered sea ice:
if (SNICAR_AD):/off by configuration toggles in the model namelists.
MPAS-source code: https://github.com/chengdang/MPAS-Model/tree/seaice/cdang_SnicarAD
ELM-source code: https://github.com/chengdang/E3SM/tree/chengdang/lnd/SNICAR_AD
Date last modified: July 1st, 2019
Contributors: Cheng Dang (Unlicensed)
This section should detail the plan for implementing the design solution for requirement XXX. In general, this section is software-centric with a focus on software implementation. Pseudo code is appropriate in this section. Links to actual source code are appropriate. Project management items, such as svn branches, timelines and staffing are also appropriate. How do we typeset pseudo code?Verification and Unit Testing
: short-desciption-of-testing-here:
- The offline radiative transfer model has been tested against a multi-stream benchmark model. (Dang, C., Zender, C. S., and Flanner, M. G.: Inter-comparison and improvement of 2-stream shortwave radiative transfer models for a unified treatment of cryospheric surfaces in ESMs, The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-22, in review, 2019.)
Date last modified:
July 1st, 2019
Contributors:
(add your name to this list if it does not appear)How will XXX be tested? i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?
Cheng Dang (Unlicensed)
Planned Validation Testing
Validation Testing:
short-desciption-of-testing-here- The modified E3SM model is tested with Pi-Control configuration, against the released Deckv1b simulation (mpas-analysis, e3sm diagnostics, and land comparison carried by the developer)
- 30-year MPAS-analysis: https://portal.nersc.gov/project/m2833/cdang/30yr.mpas_analysis.m2m.SNICAR_AD_landseaice_vs_DECKv1b.piControl.ne30_oEC.edison/
- 30-year E3SM diagnostics: https://portal.nersc.gov/project/m2833/cdang/30yr.e3sm_diags.m2m.SNICAR_AD_landseaice.SNICAR_AD_seaice.ne30_oEC.edison/viewer/
Date last modified: July 1st, 2019
Contributors:
(add your name to this list if it does not appear)How will XXX be tested? What observational or other dataset will be used? i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?Cheng Dang (Unlicensed)
Planned Performance Testing
Performance Testing:
short-desciption-of-testing-hereDate last modified:Contributors:
(add your name to this list if it does not appear)
The new implementation is not expected to have a significant impact on the computational cost/performance of E3SM.