Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Anthropogenic non-CO2 emissions: Capture the workflow. J-F Lamarque has done this for iESM cases in the past. How do we do this moving forward?

    • Phil R.: irregular grids make this more complicated. Interpolation on the fly supported in the atm code, but not well documented, maybe not always conservative. Could make this more rigorous.

    • Phillip C-S.: Haven't paid enough attention to new scenarios for ACME. Need more attention here. Maintain compatibility with CESM in terms of file formats, etc.

    • Andy Jones: what is happening for CMIP6 to translate the emissions data for new scenarios?
  • Ruby: what is the requirement for LULC?
    • Peter: we need to look at the way LULC datasets are used in transient SP cases.
  • Latent heat of fusion and ice
    • Peter Thornton: land will add this as a task to make sure we know what the land is doing with these fluxes. Compare with atmosphere.
  • clear-sky albedo
    • Phit R. is working on this, will get information to the land group for next step sensitivity testing.
    • Shaocheng Xie: is this a high priority for V1?
  • Isotopes:
    • Bill R.: oxygen isotopes and deuterium are in BeTR and CLM5, are we bringing it into ACME?
    • Peter: Also we have carbon isotopes currently active in 
  • Precip over topography:
    • both riverflow and hgih resolution precip datasets can be useful in evaluating the model precip.

 

Performance Group Notes

/wiki/spaces/PERF/pages/73793546