Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Proposed naming convention for E3SM V2 and newer compsets:

map_grida_to_gridb_ToolAlgorithm.nc

Where grida and gridb are existing grid naming conventions established by the respective component.

Here we propose to standardize the suffix to denote the Tool and Algorithm used:

Tool:

  • esmf: Earth System Modeling Framework

  • nco: NCO

  • tr: Tempest Remap

  • mbtr: (for MOAB-Tempest).

Algorithm:

  • aave: Maps which compute a common refinement (intersection) mesh and then integrate a piecewise-constant reconstruction.

    • pros: conservative, montonone, downscaling

    • cons: 1st order accurate, blocky results if source grid resolution << source grid resolution

  • bilin: ESMF’s bilinear interpolation

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order accurate

    • cons: non-conservative. aliasing errors if source grid resolution >> target grid resolution

  • patch: ESMF’s patch based algorithm (L2 projection?).

    • pros: accurate. is it downscaling?

    • cons: can have small non-monotone weights

  • mono: TR developed algorithms which use a spectral element with monotone basis functions. The degrees of freedom for the basis function (“np”) is usually denoted in the grid name, such as ne30np4. For FV grids, only np=1 is supported.

    • monoSE2FV: SE monotonic basis reconstruction integrated over FV (np=1) cells

    • monoSE2SE: projection between source and target grid monotonic reconstructions

    • monoFV2SE: does this exist?

    • monoFV2FV: identical to aave, recommend using aave suffix.

    • pros: conservative, monotone, downscaling

    • cons: 1st order accurate

  • intbilin: Integrated bilinear. For finite element grids, the shape functions are replaced by a piecewise linear shape functions which are then integrated using a common refinement mesh

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order, downscaling

    • cons: only supported for SE2FV? Does it work SE2SE?

  • inttrilin: Integrated linear reconstruction using triangular grids?

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order(?), downscaling

    • cons: does not exist yet!

  • volumetric: should we add a convention for TR’s volumetric maps?

    • might be useful for FV->SE maps. currently not used

  • highorder: Use of SE shape functions or higher order FV for reconstruction, projected onto SE shape functions, or integrated over FV cell (np=1)

    • The most accurate SE2SE and SE2FV maps.

    • Currently not recommended due to large negative weights

  • {algorithm}trn: For any map from gridA to gridB, one can compute an area weighted transpose map from gridB to gradA. In general, the transpose map will not preserve the properties of the original map. However, the transpose of a conservative map will be conservative. The transpose of a monotone conservative map will be monotone and conservative.

Examples:

Suffix = esmfaave, esmfbilin, ncoaave, trmono, trmonotrn, trintbilin, trhighorder, mbtrmono, ...

Historical usage:


_aave.nc:        ESMF conservative/monotone "area averaged" maps
_bilin.nc:       ESMF bilinear
_mono.nc       TempestRemap conservative, monotone map
_highorder.nc TempestRemap high-order, conservative, non-monotone  ( several TR options in this category )
_intbilin.nc       TempestRemap integrated bilinear:   monotone, non-conservative
_monotr.nc     TempestRemap transpose of a mono map.  
_highordertr.nc   TempestRemap transpose of a highorder map.  (not recommended) 

_conserve.nc. Used for a short time for TR conservative, high-order, non-monotone maps. Confusing since "conserve" implies it's a replacement for an "aave" type map, when really that type of map is a replacement for "bilin".   

  • No labels