A8 Improvements to Aerosols and Clouds Design Document


The Design Document page provides a description of the algorithms, implementation and planned testing including unit, verification, validation and performance testing. Please read  Step 1.3 Performance Expectations that explains feature documentation requirements from the performance group point of view. 

Design Document

 Click here for instructions to fill up the table below ......

The first table in Design Document gives overview of this document, from this info the Design Documents Overview page is automatically created.

In the table below, 4.Equ means Equations and Algorithms, 5.Ver means Verification, 6.Perf - Performance, 7. Val - Validation

  • Equations: Document the equations that are being solved and describe algorithms
  • Verification Plans: Define tests that will be run to show that implementation is correct and robust. Involve unit tests to cover range of inputs as well as benchmarks.
  • Performance expectations: Explain the expected performance impact from this development
  • Validation Plans: Document what process-based, stand-alone component, and coupled model runs will be performed, and with what metrics will be used to assess validity

Use the symbols below (copy and paste) to indicate if the section is in progress or done or not started.

In the table below, 4.Equ means Equations and Algorithms, 5.Ver means Verification, 6.Perf - Performance, 7. Val - Validation,   (tick) - completed, (warning) - in progress, (error) - not done



Overview table for the owner and an approver of this feature

1.Description

New Improvements to Aerosols and Clouds

2.Owner
3.Created
 
4.Equ(tick)
5.Ver(tick)
6.Perf(tick)
7.Val(tick)
8.Approver
9.Approved Date
V1.0Accepted
 Click here for Table of Contents ...

Table of Contents


Title: New Improvements to Aerosols and Clouds

Requirements and Design

ACME Atmosphere Group

Date:  
 

Summary

The goal of this task is to implement to the ACME V1 model newly improved treatments of aerosols, clouds and aerosol-cloud interactions, including
  •  Improved treatment of aerosol resuspension from drop evaporation.  (RESUSP_TO_COARSE)
  • Improved treatment of H2SO4 vapor fro new particle formation.  (H2SO4_TIME_SPLIT)
  • New treatment of trace gas removal and SO2 solubility.  (GAS_WET_REMOVE)
  • New treatment of sub-grid vertical velocity for ice nucleation (WSUB)
  • Parameterization of the impact of pre-existing ice crystals on ice nucleation in cirrus clouds (PREICE)
  • Classical-nucleation-theory based parameterization for mixed-phase clouds (CNT)
  • New treatment of ice crystal to snow conversion (DCS)

References:


Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1503-1520, doi:10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015, 2015.

Wan, H., Rasch, P. J., Zhang, K., Kazil, J., and Leung, L. R.:  Numerical issues associated with compensating and competing processes in climate models: an example from ECHAM-HAM.  Geosci. Model. Devel., 6, 861-874, 2013.

Wang, Y., Liu, X., Hoose, C., and Wang, B.: Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10411-10430, doi:10.5194/acp-14-10411-2014, 2014.

Requirements

  1. RESUSP_TO_COARSE: the aerosol wet-scavenging modules are revised to use a more physically-based treatment in which all aerosol material is released to the coarse mode as relatively large particles. This requires a modest increase in the number of transported aerosol species (i.e., coarse-mode BC, POA and SOA)
  2. H2SO4_TIME_SPLIT: modify the MAM treatment of H2SO4 vapor production and loss to use a parallel time-split approach, instead of a serial time-split approach.

  3. GAS_WET_REMOVE: Implement a new treatment of trace gas removal
  4. WSUB: implement a new sub-grid parameterization of the characteristic updraft velocity, assuming a Gaussian distribution for the sub-grid variation of vertical velocities.
  5. PREICE: modify the ice nucleation scheme to consider the impact of pre-existing ice crystals
  6. CNT: add a classical-nucleation-theory based parameterization for mixed-phase clouds
  7. DCS: add a temperature dependent threshold size for auto conversion of cloud ice to snow
     

Date last modified:   
 

Contributors: Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh
 


Each requirement is to be listed under a ”section” heading, as there will be a one-to-one correspondence between requirements, design, proposed imple- mentation and testing. Requirements should not discuss technical software issues, but rather focus on model capability. To the extent possible, require- ments should be relatively independent of each other, thus allowing a clean design solution, implementation and testing plan.


Algorithmic Formulations


  1. For RESUSP_TO_COARSE, to be documented.
  2. For H2SO4_TIME_SPLIT, to be documented.
  3. For GAS_WET_REMOVE, see Neu and Prather (2012)
  4. For PREICE, see Shi et al. (2015)
  5. For CNT, see Wang et al. (2014) 
  6. For WSUB, see this page.
  7. For DCS, see this page.

Date last modified: 

Contributors:  Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh



Design and Implementation

Implementation:

Code design/implementation for all the sub-tasks, except for GAS_WET_REMOVE that will follow an initial implementation to CESM, has been done in separate ACME branches. Closely related implementations will be grouped together for testing and pull request.   

Date last modified:  

Contributors: Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh


Planned Verification and Unit Testing 

Verification and Unit Testing: 

We will run tests to verify that the B4B with default model is maintained and results of the new implementation is consistent with our expectations based on the physics and/or with those in the published studies (see references above). 

Date last modified:   
Contributors: Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh


Planned Validation Testing 

Validation Testing: 

Results of the ACME model with the new implementations will be validated against those in the published studies (see references above). As documented in our progress reports, for some of the sub-tasks results have been evaluated against in-situ measurements at fixed stations and/or in field campaigns, as well as satellite and ground-based remote sensing data. 

Date last modified:  
Contributors: Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh


Planned Performance Testing 

Performance Testing: 

Except for the RESUSP_TO_COARSE sub-task, in which three additional tracers will increase computational cost by less than 10%, the new implementations are not expected to have significant impact on the computational performance, but we will work with the performance team to get the new implementations in ACME fully tested.

Date last modified:  
Contributors: Hailong WangRichard Easter (Unlicensed)Kai ZhangBalwinder Singh