Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

This page should describe Performance Assessment Tests performed for this stand alone feature and should provide links to all the result pages.

Summary


Performance for coupled runs from /wiki/spaces/COM/pages/941096965 is evaluated from timers:

Default run: cam_run3(total homme time)=12613, dynamics in homme=2897, adv+remap in homme=8951

Run 20, almost optimal configuration: cam_run3(total homme time)=3654, dynamics in homme=1887, adv+remap in homme=1618

Overall, total saving in homme time is of more than factor of 3 for 1 degree run.


Performance Test 1

Performance Test 1: short-desciption-of-testing-here

Date last modified:

Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)

Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc:)

Results: (link to results, data and plots)


How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?


SL performance was measured at full scale on Edison and Cori-KNL. Results are documented in these slides. The first figure below is from those slides. The second figure shows SL performance when coupled to preqx, theta-l hydrostatic, and thetal-l nonydrostatic dycores/modes. In the first figure, there are 40 tracers; in the second, only 10.


Performance Test 2

Performance Test 2: short-desciption-of-testing-here

Date last modified:

Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)


Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc:)

Results: (link to results, data and plots)


How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?

  • No labels