Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

This page should describe Verification and Unit Tests performed for this stand alone feature and should provide links to all the result pages.

Summary

on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/e3sm_scratch/.


Unit Testing 

Unit Testing: short-desciption-of-testing-here

Date last modified:  

Contributors: Yilin Fang


Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc:)

Results: (link to results, data and plots)

Point case model setup was from Kennedy et al. (2019) under the ambient condition.  Model parameters in Table 1 of Kennedy et al. (2019).

  • Spinup results without PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_verification/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run
  • Spinup results with PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_verification/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run_phs
  • Post spinup results without PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_ver_rst/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run
  • Post spinup results with PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_ver_rst/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run

Volumetric soil water content at 50 cm depth without PHS (middle panel) using ELM differs from those simulated by CLM5 (Figure (a) in the right panel) in Kennedy et al.

The following two figure shows stress factor (BTRAN) comparison with (left) and without PHS (right) in Sep, Oct and Nov of 2003.  They are higher compared to the Kennedy paper (solid line in the figure on the bottom).  The discrepancy may be caused by the Medlyn photosynthesis model and soil water calculation in CLM5.

As the soil moisture simulations don't match between the models, the match between ELM and CLM5 in terms of plant organ water potentials is not expected.  However, similar to CLM5 simulation (Figure (a) in the bottom panel), root water potential is higher than the others and there is almost no discrepancy among stem, leaves (top figure below).




Verification Test 1


Verification Test 1: short-desciption-of-testing-here

Date last modified:  

Contributors: Yilin Fang

Some functions such as PLC (vulnerability curve) were verified using excel.

Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc.)

Results: (link to results, data and plots)


How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?






  • No labels