...
Cryosphere – Todd Ringler, leader, Wuyin Lin, deputy, Mark Petersen, deputy
Biogeochemical Cycles – Katherine Calvin, leader; Susannah Burrows, deputy
infrastructure and data management – Robert Jacob, leader; Chengzhu (Jill) Zhang, deputy
Performance – Philip Jones, leader, Sarat Sreepathi, deputy
The science question groups will complete the v1 experimental campaign, which may include additional necessary changes to the model system. They will also complete the integration and testing of new developments for the v2 modeling system, including the completion of the code review process for each configuration, prior to the start of the v2 experimental campaign. The infrastructure has the responsibilities of maintaining and extending the project’s software system, associated scripts, analysis software and management, curation and distribution of production simulation output. The performance group will test and apply optimal model layouts for the simulation campaign configurations and solve problems associated with changes in the software stacks (compilers, libraries, I/O systems, etc.) at the Office of Science computing centers.
...
The Council will be composed of the XC, the five core activity group leaders and the leaders of the four NGD sub-projects. All major project decisions will be discussed and vetted through the Council. In practice and based on experience, most major decisions are achieved through consensus of the Council. In cases for which that is not possible, the Executive Committee will make all final decisions. The XC and DOE National Laboratories’ managements will identify project staff members to serve as points-of-contact at each of the participating laboratories (Lab POCs). POCs will report to the XC on laboratory participation and costs, represent the project to their lab managements, and work with lab, project, and DOE management as needed to resolve any problems. Figure shows the organizational structure of the E3SM Phase II project.
Figure . Organizational structure of the E3SM Phase II Project. |
Project execution
The management paradigm delegates authority down to the Epic leaders within the five groups and four NGD subprojects. This is shown in Figure 23. The leadership's role is to provide assistance, when needed, as well as overseeing the coordination and integration between and among the project elements. The roadmaps, which will be derived from the strategic plan and proposal, will be sufficiently defined and detailed so that they provide scope and guidance to each Epic team and its leader.
...