Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Mesoscale/submesoscale eddies

    • Eddy Energy CPT examining in detail source and sinks of eddy energy from high resolution simulations and observations. Working to constrain an eddy energetics scheme and backscatter.

  • Non-Boussinesq and Nonhydrostatic, but questions remain when and where these capabilities are needed

  • SUMMARY: focus on scale aware parameterization is critical and determining what advances are needed in what regions.

Advances to leverage

  • ML equation discovery and physics informed NN can parameterize mesoscale eddy effects. Need to think about how to couple current codes with advanced ML/AI algorithms that are not FORTRAN.

    • ML can expose issues with model DYCORE. For example it may expose the need for a more accurate advection scheme

  • Ensembles are needed to help evaluate models, can also use this capability to do some parameter optimization (simple ML) especially in coupled mode (assimilation in all components)

  • SUMMARY: Physics informed ML and ensembles hold promise for better understanding models and improving projections

How do we accelerate progress

  • Community involvement

    • Even though E3SM is not a community model, we need input from outside researchers.

    • Need to create an infrastructure that allows outside researchers to run the model without significant time and effort from E3SM staff

    • Need clear documentation of the model and associated workflows

    • For developments to come back to E3SM, clear standards of testing and design standards are necessary.

  • Levels of model complexity

    • We can’t drive to high resolution alone

    • Low resolution models allow for more rapid testing and development

      • Also can address different science questions (projections and uncertainty)

    • Lower complexity models allow to isolate processes and test new ideas

    • Work is needed to understand the minimum set of processes and feedbacks needed to understand the model.

    • Need reduced set of BGC for testing and to move toward examination of BGC/ocean physics coupling

  • SUMMARY: investment is needed to make university involvement easier. An initial upfront cost but leads to lower cost over the longer term.

Notes:

Laure Zanna: Turbulence Closures in Ocean Models

...