Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The Design Document page provides a description of the algorithms, implementation and planned testing including unit, verification, validation and performance testing. Please read  Step 1.3 Performance Expectations that explains feature documentation requirements from the performance group point of view. 

...

Page Properties
idFeature_PR


Info

Overview table for the owner and an approver of this feature

1.Description

Retuning of GWD to improve QBO
2.OwnerJadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed) Chih-Chieh-Jack Chen
3.Created
4.Equ(error)
5.Ver(error)
6.Perf(error)
7.Val(error)
8.Approver
9.Approved Date
V2.0



...

E3SM Group_name (for example Watercycle)  Water Cycle

Date:

...

  

Summary


The convective gravity wave (GW) source parameterization in large part controls the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). In E3SM, v1 the QBO is too strong and too fast. We have made modifications to parameters in the GW parameterization that improve the representation of the QBO in terms of the period and amplitude.

Requirements

Requirement:

name-of-requirement-here

Minor changes to source and namelist

Date last modified: 

// date

 
Contributors:

 @ name  (add your name to this list if it does not appear)Each requirement is to be listed under a ”section” heading, as there will be a one-to-one correspondence between requirements, design, proposed imple- mentation and testing. Requirements should not discuss technical software issues, but rather focus on model capability. To the extent possible, require- ments should be relatively independent of each other, thus allowing a clean design solution, implementation and testing plan.

Algorithmic Formulations

Design solution: short-description-of-proposed-solution-here

Date last modified:// date
Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)

For each requirement, there is a design solution that is intended to meet that requirement. Design solutions can include detailed technical discussions of PDEs, algorithms, solvers and similar, as well as technical discussion of performance issues. In general, this section should steer away from a detailed discussion of low-level software issues such as variable declarations, interfaces and sequencing.

Design and Implementation

Implementation: short-desciption-of-implementation-here

Date last modified: // date
Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)

This section should detail the plan for implementing the design solution for requirement XXX. In general, this section is software-centric with a focus on software implementation. Pseudo code is appropriate in this section. Links to actual source code are appropriate. Project management items, such as svn branches, timelines and staffing are also appropriate. How do we typeset pseudo code?

 Wuyin LinJadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed)


Algorithmic Formulations

Design solution: All the code mods that are required are as follows:

in gw_convect.F90
real(r8), parameter :: CF = 12.5_r8

and in user_nl_cam
effgw_beres = 0.35

Date last modified:  
Contributors: Jadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed) Chih-Chieh-Jack Chen Wuyin Lin


Design and Implementation

Implementation: 
Transfer above parameters to code

Date last modified:  
Contributors: Jadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed) Wuyin Lin


Planned Verification and Unit Testing 

Verification and Unit Testing:

short-desciption-of-testing-here

 

Date last modified:   
Contributors: 

(add your name to this list if it does not appear)

Wuyin Lin


How will XXX be tested? i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?

Planned Validation Testing 

Validation Testing:

short-desciption-of-testing-here

30 yrs AMIP and coupled simulations: comparisons of QBO in simulations with above parameter changes in E3SMv1 (already ran and submitted for publication); 

Evaluation of resolved wave spectra. Need to have daily means of: PRECT, OMEGA500, FLUT, U200, and U850 in output.

Date last modified:  
Contributors: 

(add your name to this list if it does not appear)How will XXX be tested? What observational or other dataset will be used?  i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?

Jadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed)



Planned Performance Testing 

Performance Testing:

short-desciption-of-testing-here

 

Date last modified:
Contributors: 

(add your name to this list if it does not appear)How will XXX be tested? i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?

Jadwiga (Yaga) Richter (Unlicensed) Wuyin Lin


Performance of the code should not be affected. Only parameter changes. Timings can be compared to previous runs.