Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Requirements

Requirement: (1) update namelist options in the default compset; (2) update size distribution of dust emission fluxes; (3) update the dust emission distribution in the boundary layer

Date last modified: 2019-06-27
Contributors: Yan Feng

The first two updates have been implemented and tested in V1. The third update is implemented and tests are not completed.

Algorithmic Formulations, and Design Implementation


Design Solution:

(1) Change dust optics (dst_a1, dst_a3, dst_c1,dst_c3) in the namelist &cam_inpam to dust_aeronet_rrtmg_c141106.nc

(2) Change fractional emissions in size bins: dust_model.F90. The new dust emission size distribution is calculated based on Kok (2011). dust_emis_fact is updated for ne30 and ne120 to constrain the global dust optical depth to 0.026~0.03

Date last modified: 2019-06-27
Contributors: Yan Feng

Updated on 2020-05-28 by Yan Feng: updated the dust optics for RRTMGP to dust_aeronet_rrtmg_c141106.nc as well as mam1 and mam3 radiative properties used by RRTMGP


Planned Verification and Unit Testing 

N/A


Planned Validation Testing 

Validation Testing: 

Implemented the new parameters and ran sensitivity simulations with V1. Evaluate the model outputs with observations

Date last modified: 2019-06-27
Contributors: Yan Feng

Table 1 list the model sensitivity studies and configurations. [updated by Yan Feng on 2020-05-28: global scaling factor is estimated from the simulations based on ERA40 reanalyses winds;

dust emissions are retuned for V2 using the model simulated winds, cf. /wiki/spaces/EWCG/pages/1045233888]


Horizontal resolution

Vertical layers

Physics configuration

Dust emission size distribution

SW optics

Global scaling factor
LRes

ne30

72

FC5AV1C-04P2

Default (Zender et al., 2003)

Default

2.05
LResTN

ne30

72

FC5AV1C-04P2

Kok (2011)

AERONET

0.95

LResTNs

ne30

72

FC5AV1C-H01A

Kok (2011)

AERONET

0.95

HResTne12072FC5AV1C-H01AKok (2011)AERONET1.2 (Default is 2.5)

Model outputs

LRes is the control run with V1. Analyzed the last 5 years of the 11-year free model run (by Qi Tang). The model outputs are in:
 /global/project/projectdirs/acme/yfeng/AcmeRuns/20161118.beta0.FC5COSP.ne30_ne30.edison/rgr/*ANN*
LResTN is a 4-year run with V1 nudged by the ERA reanalyses (2009-2012) after 1-year spin up. The model outputs are in:
/global/project/projectdirs/acme/yfeng/AcmeRuns/Dustv1_anvil_5d_H_NdgHyb/rgr/*ANN*
LResTNs is a 2-year run with V1 nudged by the ERA reanalyses (2009-2010) after spin up. the model outputs are in:
/global/project/projectdirs/acme/yfeng/AcmeRuns/Dustv1_edison_NdgHyb_dsd_extAN_mamAN_dstemi095/rgr/*ANN*
HResT is a 1-year free model run after spin up. The model outputs are in:
/global/project/projectdirs/acme/yfeng/AcmeRuns/Dustv1_anvil_ne120_H_Hyb_dstemi12/rgr/*ANN*
Evaluation:
(1) Dust aerosol optical depth (AOD) and absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) are compared with the AERONET data (INV Version3) averaged between 2006-2015 for sites near the dust sources. LResTN and LResTNs show better agreement with the observed AAOD
                                  Dust AAOD                                                                      Dust AOD

AERONET near source regionsLRes (Correlation with AERONET data)LResTNLResTNs
AOD0.311

0.299 (0.91)

0.284 (0.96)

0.282 (0.97)
AAOD0.0170.04 (0.69)0.022(0.72)0.022(0.74)


               
(2) Kok et al. (2017) showed that the new size distribution (Kok, 2011) compares better with recent emission flux measurements (Fig 1c in their paper) than other size distributions.
(3) Impact on global dust AOD:


Dust AODTotalAccumulationCoarse

LRes

0.026

0.0093

0.0171

LResTN

0.026

0.0040

0.0214

LResTNs

0.025

0.0040

0.0214

HResT0.04



Kok, J. F. (2011). Does the size distribution of mineral dust aerosols depend on the wind speed at emission? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(19), 10149-10156. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000296357300009

Kok, J. F., Ridley, D. A., Zhou, Q., Miller, R. L., Zhao, C., Heald, C. L., et al. (2017). Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance. Nature Geoscience, 10(4), 274-278. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000398162800014

Zender, C. S., Bian, H. S., & Newman, D. (2003). Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 108(D14). <Go to ISI>://WOS:000184611000001

Planned Performance Testing 

No changes in performance