...
/global/cscratch1/sd/golaz/ACME_simulations/20180307.DECKv1b_H5.ne30_oEC.edison
Files on Edison HPSS:
Code tag/hash
7de18fc70077eba2b25ee61a73f4e580b56ee9a7 (from master)
...
run_acme.20180307.DECKv1b_H5.ne30_oEC.edison.csh
Standard diagnostics (overvioverview pageew page)
Climate Variability Diagnostics Package (CVDP)
...
PMP global plot for H1 (other ensemble results are very similar):
Sea ice summary
These results summarize the thickness patterns for the latter part of the historical runs, split into means bounded at the start of this century. The ensemble spread in the patterns is consistent with other coupled models, although we still have biases to address, both in the ice edge, especially in the Labrador Sea, and in the lack of build-up of ice against the Canadian Archipelago, which is needed to accurately simulate ice mass loss for a warming Arctic. In separate work, an objective measure of model skill is being obtained using an ICESat satellite emulator using high-frequency sea ice output from the DECK simulations from 2003-2008.
For the figures below, the first set provide a summary Northern and Southern hemisphere ensemble means for March and September sea ice thickness for two decades leading up to year 2000 (a and c), and the first 15 years of the 21st century (b and d). Model ice thickness is truncated at 15% concentration, and magenta represents the NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) ice extent for the same averaging periods. Grid density on the polar stereographic projection is indicated by cell translucence. Numbers in the lower right corner of each panel indicate the mean hemispheric ice thickness for the thinnest ensemble member (blue), the multi-ensemble mean rendered in the map (black), and the thickest ensemble member (red) for the each period.
The breakdown by historical ensemble member is provided here:
