Versions Compared

Old Version 48

changes.mady.by.user Matt Hoffman

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Jim Benedict

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Dates: July 16th -18th ( Tuesday to Thursday. Check-in on Monday evening; end of meeting around noon on Thursday)

...

Event homepage and registration: https://web.cvent.com/event/c8d8cf66-adc7-4993-b9a8-6c0b9b1f1712/summary Draft agenda:

View filenameSciDAC_PI_2024_-_Draft_Agenda_April 8.docxFull Meeting Agenda: https://web.cvent.com/event/c8d8cf66-adc7-4993-b9a8-6c0b9b1f1712/websitePage:4f5780f1-9811-4588-8a98-fb418e1b1636

Coordinators for BER component of meeting: Xujing Jia Davis , Matt Hoffman, Hui Wan

...

Additional info on this page

Table of Contents

...

Important dates

...

BER Participant list

BER

...

Breakout Agenda for SciDAC Meeting Site, see details and instructions in the detailed Agenda below : https://acme-climate.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/1776779303/pages/4420436007/

...

BER Breakout Session Agenda

Wednesday, July 17, 2024

Schedule for the day

  • 8:30 AM ET

...

  • Partnership Breakout

...

  • Session 1 (see below)

  • 10:30 AM ET

...

  • Break (15 min)

  • 10:45 AM ET

...

  • Partnership Breakout

...

  • Session 2 (see below)

  • 12:45 PM ET

...

  • Lunch (Networking)

  • 1:45 PM ET

...

  • Group Photo session (Location TBD)

  • 2:30 PM ET

...

  • Poster Session (In Person only)

  • Afternoon Break: set up in poster session area

Session 1 Agenda

8:30-10:30am

Talks/topics

Notes

Dorothy' remarks (5 min)

Gary’s remarks

Xujing overview/intro

10 min

View file
nameSciDACPImeeting2024_BER_BreakoutSession_XDavis_Intro_Final.pptx

Project updates (70 min)

10 minutes each

  • QBO

    View file
    namescidac_qbo-e3sm_benedict_PImeetingSlides_202407_noSupp.pptx

  • PAESCAL

    View file
    nameHuiWan_PAESCAL_update_2024.pptx

  • ImPACTS

    View file
    nameImPACTS_scidacPImeeting_2024.pptx

  • SEAHORCE

    View file
    nameSEAHORCE SciDAC PI Meeting 20240716.pptx

  • MPAS-SI-MPM

    View file
    nameSulsky-overview2024.pptx

  • RDycore

    View file
    nameRDycore_2024_07_SciDAC_PI.pdf

  • FAnSSIE

    View file
    nameHoffman_FAnSSIE_2024update_talk.pptx

Participants: Each project should prepare a 10 min project update. Please upload pdf/ppt next to your project name on the left before the session.

  • NOT a complete overview - assume other participants are familiar with your project

  • Suggested format:

    • 1 slide on high level project overview reminder

    • 3-4 slides of project highlights over the past year - either actual highlight slides submitted to BER or other activities at that level. Focus on the BER/ASCR collaboration part of the activity and less on the scientific details. Can include significant capabilities you have developed that may be of interest to other projects.

    • 1-2 slides on specific challenges, change in scope. It’s ok to admit adjustments - these are high risk projects and we will all learn from how each of us have had to modify our plans.

Q&A (10 Minutes)

Discussion (45 30 min)

Led by Mauro Perego & SJShinjae Yoo

  • collaboration between domain scientists and computational scientists

    • Perspective of comp. scientists on how working with Earth system projects compares with other application areas in which they work. What can be learned from other subject areas.

Google Doc for notes and comments

Participants, please add discussion topics/questions here :

  • For comp. scientists, what do you like about working with Earth system modelers?

  • What are some quirks or unique ways of doing things that differ from other applications areas?

    • What are some things that are annoying or you think could be done better? (smile)

    before the start of the meeting:

    • Challenges in starting and maintaining a collaboration:

      • success and failures stories

      • difficulties in keeping people engaged (on both sides)

      • Tension between domain scientists' goals and computational scientists' goals. How to find a good balance

      • What concepts or terminology is confusing or could use more specific definitions?

      • What could be done better?

      • How long does it take to develop a successful collaboration between domain and comp. scientists?

    • What are some quirks or unique ways of doing things that differ from other applications areas?

    • For comp. scientists, what do you like about working with Earth system modelers?

    Session 2 Agenda

    10:45am-12:45pm

    Google Doc for notes and comments

    Talks/topics

    Notes

    Presentations about future E3SM Plans (60 45 min)

    10-15 min each with questions

    • Wuyin (atm, coupled)

      View file
      nameSciDAC5_2024_E3SM_Atmos_CoupledSystem.pptx

    • Luke (ocean, sea ice, land ice)

      View file
      namescidac_pi_meeting_e3sm_overview.pptx

      View file
      nameInvalid file id - df01b166-fde3-4a6c-babd-4974bfdc0abb

    • Gautam (land, river)

      View file
      nameE3SM_Land_River_Oveview.pptx

    These talks are meant to give SciDAC projects a view to what is coming for E3SM and how their projects fit within expected plans in E3SM.

    • expectations for transition plans for scidac capabilities into E3SM

    Discussions (1 hour and 15 minutes)

    Participants, please add discussion topics/questions belowhere before the start of the meeting:

    • Collaboration/coordination between SciDAC and E3SM (30 minutes)
      (moderator: Matt Hoffman)

    • How to deal with SciDAC projects working on different components (newer or older) than mainline E3SM?

    • Tensions between high-risk model development in SciDAC and low risk tolerance of production model.

    • AI/ML discussion (30 minutes)
      (moderator: Hui Wan)

    • How are our projects using or developing AI/ML methods? (See simple survey in Google Doc)

    • What ML applications have worked well for your project? What have not?

    • computing resource discussion (15 minutes, time permitting)
      (moderator: Sarat Sreepathi)

    • What machines do you primarily use?

    • Challenges coordinating machine usage between SciDAC and E3SM ?

    (Prepare for ~12 min report-back to plenary)

    ...

    Posters

    Poster sessions:

    • Tuesday, July 16: 3:15-5:15 pm

    • Wednesday, July 17: 2:30-5:00 pm

    Poster guidance

    • Each BER SciDAC project has 2 or 3 poster slots.

      • PAESCAL, IMPACTS = 3 posters

      • All others = 2 posters

    • Unlike last year, where we gave specific guidance on poster topics, this year use your posters however you see fit. A high level project overview poster is not required (but could be used). Some ideas:

      • focus on specific exciting results

      • discuss ASCR/BER partnership successes

      • describe a computational tool that may be of interest to other projects

      • short summaries of progress in various project areas

      • high level project overview

      • etc.

    Logistics

    Participants, don’t forget to submit poster title and abstract to the meeting site:

    Poster Information:

    Project

    Lead Author/Presenter

    Poster Title

    RDycore

    Jeffrey Johnson

    Initial Development and Integration of River Dynamical Core in E3SM

    View file
    nameJohnsonJ_BER_poster.pdf

    RDycore

    Gautam Bisht

    Development of Physics Benchmarks for River Dynamical Core

    PAESCAL

    Hui Wan

    PAESCAL: Addressing Numerical Challenges of Process Coupling in the E3SM Atmosphere Model (EAM)

    View file
    nameWanH_BER_poster.pdf

    PAESCAL

    Justin Dong

    Existence and Uniqueness Analysis of Ocean- Atmosphere Surface Exchange in E3SM

    View file
    nameDongJ_BER_poster.pdf

    PAESCAL

    Tao Zhang

    Physics-informed Deep Learning for Moist Physics Parameterization

    View file
    nameTaoZ_BER_poster.pdf

    FAnSSIE

    Jerry Watkins

    Performance and Stewardship of E3SM ice-sheet model MALI

    MPAS-SI-MPM

    Deborah Sulsky

    Spatiotemporal Clustering Algorithms for Lead Detection in SAR Data and Surrogate Models for MPAS-Seaice

    View file
    nameGuanY_BER_poster.pdf

    MPAS-SI-MPM

    Onkar Sahni

    Accelerator/GPU Support for the Material Point Method in Sea Ice Simulations in MPAS Framework within E3SM

    View file
    nameSahniO_BER_poster.pdf

    QBO

    Benedict

    Advancing the QBO in E3SM through Surrogate-accelerated Parameter Optimization and Vertical Grid Modification

    View file
    nameBenedictJ_BER.pdf

    QBO

    Damiano

    SURROGATE-ACCELERATED MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION FOR IMPROVING THE QBO

    View file
    namescidac24_poster_v4sand.pdf

    ...

    Planning notes for BER breakout (participants can ignore)

    Thoughts from the first planning meeting on (Xujing, Matt, and Hui):

    ...

    1. Use of AI/ML.

      1. How are our projects using AI/ML currently? Are there any planned explorations or explorations that we wish to carry out but need help for?

      2. Among the many different research activities that can benefit the development, evaluation, and application of E3SM (e.g., understanding observations, constructing fine-scale process models, developing parameterizations, harmonizing components in large-scale models, tuning uncertain parameters, identifying model deficiencies, etc.), are there sweet spots - or known bad hit places - for the use of AI/ML techniques?

    2. Collaboration between SciDAC projects and the E3SM project.

      1. What are E3SM’s development plans in the next years? We plan to get an overview from SciDAC project team members who are also on E3SM’s leadership team.

        1. CMIP7 scenarios / new model configurations

      2. In the context of E3SM’s planned changes in programming language as well as the anticipated changes in HPC software and hardware, how can we better position SciDAC projects for the integration of their products into E3SM?

    3. Collaboration between domain scientists and computational scientists.

      1. Collaborations between domain scientists and computational scientists are known to be very challenging. Colleagues who have gone through more than 1 SciDAC cycle have had the general impression that fruitful collaborations require commitment from both sides and willingness to make long-term investment. Do we have success stories and lessons to share? Are we facing any specific challenges? Are there ways to further facilitate the interdisciplinary collaborations?

    4. Computing resource discussion

      1. Compare notes on: what machines we run on, what computational budgets we need/use, tips and tricks for maximizing resources (e.g. queue strategies)

    PIs and BER project participants, please feel free to add your suggestions or comments here.