This page should describe Performance Assessment Tests performed for this stand alone feature and should provide links to all the result pages.
| Table of Contents |
|---|
Summary
Short summary of what was done and what was the result.
Performance Test 1
Performance Test 1:
...
Increase in run time for Linoz v2 at 2 degrees
Date last modified:
Contributors: Philip Cameron-Smith (Unlicensed)(add your name to this list if it does not appear)
Provenance:
...
Branch cameronsmith1/atm/Ozone-hole-Linoz-v2 from v0.3-212-gadbcc2b (simulations around Sept 5, 2015)
Results: (link to results, data and plots)
How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?
Performance Test 2
Performance Test 2: short-desciption-of-testing-here
Date last modified:
Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)
Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc:)
Results: (link to results, data and plots)
How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?
Model cost for 2 degree FV ACMEv0.3 simulations on Titan with 560 PEs (x=pe-hrs/simulated_year):
MAM3 mean(x) = 2333.83, stddev(x) = 51.1981, stderr(x) = 9.05064 ( 32 simulations of 4 months each)
MAM3 with Linoz mean(x) = 2367.33, stddev(x) = 40.3739, stderr(x) = 12.1732 ( 11 simulations of 4 months each) (+1.4% +/- 0.5% relative to MAM3)
MAM3 with Linoz and extra output mean(x) = 2388.38, stddev(x) = 43.6466, stderr(x) = 13.16 ( 11 simulations of 4 months each) (+2.3% +/- 0.6% relative to MAM3)
The extra cost of Linoz (1.4% +/- 0.5%) is in line with the expected cost of an extra tracer for FV.