Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The second issue identified is with the dust size distribution at emission used in the model, which leads to over-predicted fine-mode (<1 um) dust particles in the atmosphere as shown by Kok et al. (2017). As a result, the overall cooling effect by dust at TOA may be over-estimated. In addition, increasing
The third issue is related to the increasing of model vertical resolution from 30 vertical layers to 72 layers has led . It leads to an over-deposition of dust in source regions and less long-range transport. Despite the global AOD is constrained by increasing , global dust emissions increase by nearly a factor of 2, dust layer height is low-biased compared to observations, and the lifetime of dust is less than 2 daysalso short than other global models.
Therefore, the following dust updates proposed for V2 will address these the above three issues identified. First, we will update the dust refractive index in the SW with the AERONET (obs)-derived values from the OPAC data (Hess, 1998) that is used in the default configuration. Second, we will update the fractional dust emission fluxes in accumulation and coarse modes, calculated with the size distribution by Kok (2011). With these updates implemented, dust emissions need to be re-tuned for the globally constrained AOD.
To fundamentally address the over-deposition bias in dust, it requires some surgical change in the code - the aerosol turbulence transport term needs to be moved from CLUBB and add to the aerosol emission/deposition equation. This issue might also need affect other aerosols and water vapor, which probably requires extensive model evaluation. In view of the timeline for the V2, a simple fix is thus proposed. We will implement an alternative option that distribute dust evenly in the PBL, instead of the lowest model layer. As insufficient dust transport is common in large-scale models for various reasons, similar approaches have been adopted in other modeling studies to enhance the dust vertical transport. We propose to implement this simple fix as an option in the namelist so that we will have a short-term solution, while we are working on a more physically-based solution.

Requirements

Requirement: (1) update namelist options in the default compset; (2) update

dust fractional emissions

size distribution of dust emission fluxes; (3) update the dust emission

layers

height 

Date last modified: 2019-05-13
Contributors: Yan Feng

The first two updates have been implemented and tested in V1. The third update is implemented and tests are not completed.



Requirement: ........

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference......

Algorithmic Formulations, and Design Implementation


Design Solution: ......

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference.....


Design Solution: ......

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference.....

 

Planned Verification and Unit Testing 

Verification and Unit Testing: .......

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference.....


Planned Validation Testing 

Validation Testing:  ........

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference.....

Planned Performance Testing 

Performance Testing: .........

Date last modified: 
Contributors: 

.....description.....

.....reference.....