Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Dates: July 16th -18th ( Tuesday to Thursday. Check-in on Monday evening; end of meeting around noon on Thursday)

...

Project

Project PI

Participant first name

Participant last name

Participant email

Participant institution

On ASCR’s list?

Wait list

QBO

Jim Benedict

Jim

Benedict

benedict@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Walter

Hannah

hannah6@llnl.gov

LLNL

No

Luis

Damiano

ladamia@sandia.gov

SNL

No

PAESCAL

Hui Wan

Hui

Wan

hui.wan@pnnl.gov

PNNL

No

Berk

Geveci

berk.geveci@kitware.com

Kitware Inc.

Yes

Wuyin

Lin

wlin@bnl.gov

BNL

No

Justin

Dong

dong9@llnl.gov

LLNL

No

Yes (priority)

Tao

Zhang

tzhang@bnl.gov

BNL

No

Yes

ImPACTS

Luke Van Roekel

Luke

Van Roekel

lvanroekel@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Shinjae

Yoo

sjyoo@bnl.gov

BNL

YES

Han Wei

Shen

shen.94@osu.edu

OSU

Yes

Wait list priority 1 – Ben

Moore-Maley

bmoorema@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Yes

Wait list priority 2 - Wei

Xu

xuw@bnl.gov

BNL

No

SEAHORCE

Rob Hetland

Katherine

Smith

kmsmith@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Hannah

Klion

klion@lbl.gov

LBL

No

Kyle

Hinson

kyle.hinson@pnnl.gov

PNNL

No

MPAS-SI-MPM

Deborah Sulsky

Deborah

Sulsky

sulsky@math.unm.edu

UNM

No

Adrian

Turner

akt@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Yawen

Guan

yawen.guan@colostate.edu

CSU

NoYes (priority 1)

Kara

Peterson

kjperter@sandia.gov

SNL

No

Yes (priority 2)

Onkar

Sahni

sahni@rpi.edu

RPI

NO

RDycore

Gautam Bisht

Gautam

Bisht

gautam.bisht@pnnl.gov

PNNL

No

Jeff

Johnson

jeff@cohere-llc.com

Cohere LLC

No

FAnSSIE

Matt Hoffman

Matt

Hoffman

mhoffman@lanl.gov

LANL

No

Mauro

Perego

mperego@sandia.gov

SNL

Yes

Mark

Shephard

shephard@rpi.edu

RPI

Yes

Jerry

Watkins

jwatkin@sandia.gov

SNL

No

Yes

...

  1. Use of AI/ML.

    1. How are our projects using AI/ML currently? Are there any planned explorations or explorations that we wish to carry out but need help for?

    2. Among the many different research activities that can benefit the development, evaluation, and application of E3SM (e.g., understanding observations, constructing fine-scale process models, developing parameterizations, harmonizing components in large-scale models, tuning uncertain parameters, identifying model deficiencies, etc.), are there sweet spots - or known bad hit places - for the use of AI/ML techniques?

  2. Collaboration between SciDAC projects and the E3SM project.

    1. What are E3SM’s development plans in the next years? We plan to get an overview from SciDAC project team members who are also on E3SM’s leadership team.

    2. In the context of E3SM’s planned changes in programming language as well as the anticipated changes in HPC software and hardware, how can we better position SciDAC projects for the integration of their products into E3SM?

  3. Collaboration between domain scientists and computational scientists.

    1. Collaborations between domain scientists and computational scientists are known to be very challenging. Colleagues who have gone through more than 1 SciDAC cycle have had the general impression that fruitful collaborations require commitment from both sides and willingness to make long-term investment. Do we have success stories and lessons to share? Are we facing any specific challenges? Are there ways to further facilitate the interdisciplinary collaborations?

PIs and BER project participants, please feel free to add your suggestions or comments here.