Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Results: (link to results, data and plots)

 

Model cost for 2 degree FV ACMEv0.3 simulations on Titan with 560 PEs (x=pe-hrs/simulated_year):

MAM3                                                  x = 2383.24,  mean(x) = 2333.83,   stddev(x) = 51.1981,   stderr(x) = 9.05064     ( 32 simulations of 4 months each)

MAM3 with Linoz                                 x = 2331.51,  mean(x) = 2367.33,   stddev(x) = 40.3739,   stderr(x) = 12.1732     ( 11 simulations of 4 months each)     (+1.4% +/- 0.5% relative to MAM3)

MAM3 with Linoz and extra output      x = 2382.79,  mean(x) = 2388.38,   stddev(x) = 43.6466,   stderr(x) = 13.16         ( 11 simulations of 4 months each)     (+2.3% +/- 0.6% relative to MAM3)

 

 

How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?

The extra cost of Linoz (1.4% +/- 0.5%) is in line with the expected cost of an extra tracer for FV. 

 


Performance Test 2

Performance Test 2: short-desciption-of-testing-here

Date last modified:

Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)

 

Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc:)

Results: (link to results, data and plots)

 

How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?