Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • aave: Maps which compute a common refinement (intersection) mesh and then integrate a piecewise-constant reconstruction.

    • pros: conservative, montonone, downscalingcell averaging good for fine-to-coarse maps.

    • cons: 1st order accurate, not suitable for upscalings coarse-to-fine maps (blocky results)

  • bilin: ESMF’s bilinear interpolation

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order accurate

    • cons: non-conservative. not suitable for downscaling fine-to-coarse maps (aliasing errors)

  • patch: ESMF’s patch based algorithm (L2 projection?).

    • pros: accurate. is it downscaling? should be good for upscalinggood for coarse-to-fine maps. not sure how it performance on fine-to-coarse maps.

    • cons: can have small non-monotone weights

  • mono: TR developed algorithms which use a spectral element with monotone basis functions. The degrees of freedom for the basis function (“np”) is usually denoted in the grid name, such as ne30np4. For FV grids, only np=1 is supported.

    • monoSE2FV: SE monotonic basis reconstruction integrated over FV (np=1) cells

    • monoSE2SE: projection between source and target grid monotonic reconstructions

    • monoFV2SE: does this exist?

    • monoFV2FV: identical to aave, recommend using aave suffix.

    • pros: conservative, monotone, downscalinggood for fine-to-coarse maps.

    • cons: 1st order accurate

    • upscaling propertiescoarse-to-fine maps? Probably good, except for FV source grids.

  • intbilin: Integrated bilinear. For finite element grids, the shape functions are replaced by a piecewise linear shape functions which are then integrated using a common refinement mesh

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order, downscaling and upscalinggood for fine-to-coarse and coarse-to-fine maps.

    • cons: only supported for SE2FV? Does it work SE2SE?

  • inttrilin: Integrated linear reconstruction using triangular grids?

    • pros: monotone, 2nd order(?), downscaling and upscaling. good for fine-to-coarse and coarse-to-fine maps

    • cons: does not exist yet!

  • volumetric: should we add a convention for TR’s volumetric maps?

    • might be useful for FV->SE maps. currently not used

  • highorder: Use of SE shape functions or higher order FV for reconstruction, projected onto SE shape functions, or integrated over FV cell (np=1)

    • The most accurate SE2SE and SE2FV maps.

    • Currently not recommended due to large negative weights

  • {algorithm}trn: For any map from gridA to gridB, one can compute an area weighted transpose map from gridB to gradA. In general, the transpose map will not preserve the properties of the original map. However, the transpose of a conservative map will be conservative. The transpose of a monotone conservative map will be monotone and conservative.

...