This page should describe Validation Tests performed for this stand alone feature and should provide links to all the result pages.
| Table of Contents |
|---|
Summary
Short summary of what was done and what was the resultGlobal offline simulations were performed using the ICNPRDCTCBC compset with and without variable soil thickness.
Validation Test 1
Validation Test 1:
...
Comparison of CTC pools with and without variable soil thickness
...
Date last modified: August 13, 2020
Contributors: Michael Brunke
Provenance:
...
ICNPRDCTCBC in mabrunke/lnd/varsoil-in-ZD2009-with-BGC vs. master
Results: (link to results, data and plots)
How was XXX be tested? i.e. how do we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?There are large effects to adding variable soil thickness in carbon and nitrogen pools, particularly for depth-to-bedrock (DTB) < 5 m. There is also some increased spread in total ecosystem nitrogen for DTBs > 22 m. Near-zero differences occur in grid cells receiving precipitation > 5 mm/day, so the larger differences arise in drier grid cells. Therefore, variable soil thickness can have a substantial impact on BGC simulated in dry locations.
Figure 1. The difference in total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus pools between simulations with and without variable soil thickness as a function of depth-to-bedrock.
Validation Test 2
Validation Test 2: short-desciption-of-testing-here
Date last modified:
Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)
Provenance: (Run provenance Link, Code Tag, etc.)
Results: (link to results, data and plots)
...