The Design Document page provides a description of the algorithms, implementation and planned testing including unit, verification, validation and performance testing. Please read Step 1.3 Performance Expectations that explains feature documentation requirements from the performance group point of view.
Design Document
| Expand | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
The first table in Design Document gives overview of this document, from this info the Design Documents Overview page is automatically created. In the overview table below 4.Equ means Equations and Algorithms, 5.Ver means Verification, 6.Perf - Performance, 7. Val - Validation
Use the symbols below (copy and paste) to indicate if the section is in progress or done or not started. |
...
| Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
...
| Expand | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
|
Title: 3D varying GM bolus Kappa and phase speed
Requirements and Design
E3SM Water Cycle Group
Date:
Summary
The Gent McWilliams (GM) parameterization of Gent and McWilliams (1995) is used to represent unresolved mesoscale eddies. In MPAS, the bolus velocity is calculated following Ferrari et al. (2010), which cast the problem as a simple ODE, i.e.
...
In equation 16a, c is the phase speed of the first baroclinic mode, N2 is the Brunt Vaisala Frequency, \gamma is the overturning stream function, and kappa is the bolus diffusivity. Presently MPAS uses constant values for both kappa and c, as suggested in the highlighted text. This design document describes the relaxation of this constant in time and space assumption.
Requirements
Requirement: Improvements should fit with the variable resolution GM capability
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed), Mark Petersen
The changes to equation 16a should fit with the current ramping of GM in variable resolution simulations
Requirement: Phase speed should be a function of space (2-D only) and time
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed), Mark Petersen
Later portions of the Ferrari et al paper describe c as the first baroclinic mode phase speed, which is defined as NH/pi, where N is integrated over the column depth H. This suggests c should vary in the horizontal and in time.
Requirement: Kappa should vary in 3D space and time
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed), Mark Petersen
Conversations with Griffies and Adcroft suggest there is no reason to fix kappa in equation 16a above. Danabasoglu and Marshall (2007) suggest kappa should vary like
Algorithmic Formulations
Design solution: new computations should not interfere with GM bolus ramp for variable resolution
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed)
The ramped GM value is stored in gmBolusKappa, which is initialized first. Our variable kappa computations use this array, preserving the ramped value.
Design solution: Add computation of c to the GM bolus routine
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed)
The code has been modified to include a computation of depth averaged stratification to get c, e.g.
...
else
cGMphaseSpeed(:) = config_gravWaveSpeed_trunc
endif
Design solution: Allow bolus Kappa to vary in time and space via N2
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed)
We have implemented the calculation of Danabasoglu and Marshall 2007, i.e.
...
kappaGM3D(k,iEdge) = gmBolusKappa(iEdge)*max(config_gm_min_stratification_ratio, &
BruntVaisalaFreqTopEdge / (maxN + 1.0E-10_RKIND))
if(kappaGM3D(k,iEdge) <= 0) then
print *, 'val = ',kappaGM3D(k,iEdge),k,iEdge
stop
endif
enddo
enddo
!$omp end do
Design and Implementation
Implementation: Modifications to GM calculation
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed)
We have added the following namelist options
...
- kappaGM3D, cGMphaseSpeed, kappaGM2D
Planned Verification and Unit Testing
Verification and Unit Testing: comparison against offline single column test
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed), Mark Petersen
The new implementation has been tested against and analytic notebook based on equation 16a. The verification passed.
Planned Validation Testing
Validation Testing: G and B-cases
Date last modified:
Contributors: Luke Van Roekel (Unlicensed)
a 50 year B-case and 62 year CORE2 case have been run confirming that the bolus kappa implementation is behaving as expected. The changes also mitigate the lab sea bias seen in v1 LR. Analysis is here
https://compy-dtn.pnl.gov/vanr302/20190723.testLuke2.A_WCYCL1850S.ne30_oECv3.compy_20_25/
Planned Performance Testing
Performance Testing: short-desciption-of-testing-here
Date last modified:
Contributors: (add your name to this list if it does not appear)
How will XXX be tested? i.e. how will be we know when we have met requirement XXX. Will these unit tests be included in the ongoing going forward?
...