...
- Spinup results without PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_verification/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run
- Spinup results with PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_verification/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run_phs
- Post spinup results without PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_ver_rst/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run
- Post spinup results with PHS on compy in /compyfs/d3m045/land_runs_ver_rst/v1.ICLM45.compy.intel.Ca54ad57/run
BTRAN-phs.jpgBTRAN-phs.jpgVolumetric soil water content at 50 cm depth without PHS (middle panel) using ELM differs from those simulated by CLM5 (Figure (a) in the right panel) in Kennedy et al.
The following two figure shows stress factor (BTRAN) comparison with (left) and without PHS in Sep, Oct and Nov of 2003. They are higher compared to the Kennedy paper (solid line in the figure on the bottom). The discrepancy may be caused by the Medlyn photosynthesis model and soil water calculation in CLM5.
As the soil moisture simulations don't match between the models, the match between ELM and CLM5 in terms of plant organ water potentials is not expected. However, similar to CLM5 simulation, root water potential is higher the others and there is almost no discrepancy among stem, leaves (top figure below).
Figure 1. Stress factor with (left) and without (right) PHS
Figure. Figure 4 in Kennedy et al. (2019)
Figure. Figure 3 in Kennedy et al. (2019)
Functions such as PLC were verified using excel.
...